CityU’s Happiness Index for Hong Kong, Japan and South Korea

Share this article 

 
Professor Dennis Wong Sing-wing, Associate Dean of CLASS at CityU, and his research team conducted a survey titled “Happiness Index: Comparison between Hong Kong, Japan and South Korea” in January 2016. More than 1,100 citizens in Hong Kong, Osaka and Seoul were interviewed. A total of 3,453 questionnaires were collected.
 
The survey aimed to understand the personal feelings of the interviewees in 2015, including their attitude towards happiness (with the minimum score 1 for not happy and the maximum score 10 for very happy) and their levels of satisfaction about the quality of life in six areas: politics and society; economy; environment; public health; leisure and entertainment; and housing (with the minimum score 1 for least satisfied and the maximum score 10 for most satisfied).
 
The survey showed that Hong Kong had the lowest score in the Happiness Index (6.83), followed by Seoul (7.01) and Osaka (7.41). (See Table 1)
 
Compared to Osaka and Seoul, Hong Kong had the lowest scores for satisfaction about the quality of life. Among the six aspects, Hong Kong people felt most dissatisfied about housing (score 4.05), followed by politics and society (4.33) and the environment (4.80). Hong Kong’s score for housing was clearly much lower than that of the other two cities (Osaka, 6.45 and Seoul, 6.19).
 
A similar survey was conducted by CLASS last year for Hong Kong, Japan (Osaka) and Singapore, with Singaporeans having the highest scores in the Happiness Index and levels of satisfaction about quality of life in all areas. To enhance the importance of the project for reference, South Korea was selected this year as it is an East Asian country with a similar quality of life to that of Hong Kong. Compared with last year, Japan’s score in the Happiness Index remained unchanged (7.41). Although its score for leisure and entertainment was the highest among all six areas, it declined slightly against last year.
 
Hong Kong people’s score in the Happiness Index dropped slightly (0.15) against last year’s results (Table 2), showing local people are still unhappy. The scores for all six areas of quality of life fell, except for public health, which showed some improvement.
 
Professor Wong said local people’s dissatisfaction with housing could be attributed to a shortage of public housing, exorbitant house prices and ineffective government policy.
 
In the area of politics and society, there have been many controversial issues, such as the incidents of excessive lead content in drinking water, the universal retirement protection scheme, and the Copyright (Amendment) Bill 2014. All these issues have aggravated the polarisation of Hong Kong society and led to dissatisfaction with the government.
 
On the environmental front, local people’s health is threatened because air quality in Hong Kong continues to deteriorate due to factors such as climate change and cross-border pollution. That’s why Hong Kong’s scores for quality of life in these three areas were below the passing mark.
 
Japanese people had the highest score for housing (6.45) and politics and society (5.48) because, Professor Wong said, Japan’s government supports low-income people and property prices are more affordable when compared with income in Japan. Furthermore, Professor Wong believed that it might be because the adverse effects of “Abenomics” had not materialised. In addition, the government led by Shinzo Abe has worked hard to improve the political, societal and economic situation in recent years, which has sustained stability.
 
Although Japan had a lower score in entertainment than South Korea did, it should be noted that the score is still as high as 7.78. Professor Wong pointed out that there were an abundance of entertainment facilities with theme parks and shopping streets in Osaka. Therefore, leisure and entertainment is the area that received the highest score for levels of satisfaction about quality of life in Japan.
 
Among the three cities, South Korea had the highest score in leisure and entertainment, public health, economy and the environment. Professor Wong said there had been a rapid development in the entertainment industry in South Korea. In addition to popular theme parks, South Korea has a lot of traditional cultural activities and unique streets that offer culturally rich options. What’s more, South Korea has significantly improved its public health system by consolidating related health insurance policies.
 
On the economic front, South Korea has been actively developing its tourism industry by converting districts like Myeong-dong and Hongdae in Seoul into hot shopping spots. Also, due to the effects of the “Korean Wave”, the locations where popular South Korean TV series were filmed have become tourist spots. Furthermore, the successful launch of electronic products in overseas markets has provided momentum for South Korea’s economic development.
 
However, the outbreak of the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) last year significantly affected South Korea’s tourism industry. Therefore, although South Korea had the highest level of satisfaction about the economy among the three cities, its score was only 5.76. On the other hand, in terms of the environment, South Korea residents were quite satisfied because the municipal government has introduced green policies aimed at tackling environmental problems such as sewage treatment and air pollution.
 
The study found that the happiness index among women in the three places is higher than that among men, on average. The reason might be because, traditionally, men suppress their feelings, often for culture reasons; while women have more channels to express themselves. As men are often the main source of financial support within a household, women tend to experience less work-related stress, and hence they are generally happier. In addition, due to their heightened educational level and social status, women no longer play an inferior role to men. Therefore, women have a much stronger sense of self-esteem and achievement.
 
The study also found that senior citizens (aged 65 or above) in Hong Kong scored higher on the happiness index than other age groups did, probably because they face less work and family stress, and many of them have retired, which is why they might be happier. On the other hand, young people (aged below 24) in Japan and South Korea were happier than the other age groups because they are mostly at school, with their parents taking care of them, and they have access to help from their families or teachers when they encounter difficulties. Thus they have less economic and work-related stress.
 
For the correlation between educational level and happiness, interviewees with primary education in all three places were the happiest people. As educated persons might have a higher expectation towards life and society, citizens with higher education level in the three places were relatively less happy about their lives.
 
Notes to editors:
 
Media enquiries: Professor Dennis Wong Sing-wing, Associate Dean of College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at CityU (Tel: 9883 6336)
 
 

Table 1: Happiness Index: Comparison between Hong Kong, Japan and South Korea (2016)
 
Hong Kong
N=1,189
Japan (Osaka) N=1,129
South Korea (Seoul) N=1,135
Mean Score
Standard Deviation
Mean Score
Standard Deviation
Mean Score
Standard Deviation
1Overall level of happiness1
6.83
1.80
7.41
1.81
7.01
1.74
2Satisfaction towards Quality of Life measures2
- Politics and society
4.33
1.77
5.48
1.76
4.77
1.86
- Economy
5.39
1.68
5.51
1.80
5.76
1.81
- Environment
4.80
1.63
5.27
2.05
5.44
1.86
- Public health
6.01
1.79
6.32
1.95
7.18
1.79
- Leisure and entertainment
6.62
1.73
7.78
1.75
7.92
1.64
- Housing
4.05
1.93
6.45
1.80
6.19
2.07
Notes:
1 Score 10 for very happy; score 1 for not happy
2 Score 10 for most satisfied; score 1 for least satisfied
 
Table 2: Happiness Index: Comparison between Hong Kong, Japan and Singapore (2015) 1
 
Hong Kong
N=1,184
Japan (Osaka) N=1,131
Singapore
N=1,153
Mean Score
Standard Deviation
Mean Score
Standard Deviation
Mean Score
Standard Deviation
1Overall level of happiness 2
6.98
1.57
7.41
1.83
7.56
1.58
2Satisfaction towards Quality of Life measures3
- Politics and society
4.41
1.84
5.34
1.74
7.11
1.71
- Economy
5.66
1.86
5.23
1.75
7.40
1.59
- Environment
4.90
1.70
5.38
2.01
7.85
1.59
- Public health
5.88
1.80
6.35
1.88
7.45
1.74
- Leisure and entertainment
6.70
1.78
7.91
1.72
7.62
1.64
- Housing
4.22
2.13
6.60
1.87
7.27
1.80
Notes:
1 The CLASS at CityU conducted a survey titled “Happiness Index: Comparison between Hong Kong, Japan and Singapore” in January 2015. A total of 3,468 questionnaires were collected.
2 Score 10 for very happy; score 1 for not happy
3 Score 10 for most satisfied; score 1 for least satisfied

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED

Back to top