Report on Social Work Fieldwork Placement |
Advisory Committee on Social Work Training and Manpower Planning (ACSWTMP) – November 1998
BACKGROUND
As fieldwork placement is a significant component in social work training and the instructor/student ratio is a main factor affecting the quality of social work graduates, it was agreed at the 152nd meeting of the Advisory Committee on Social Work Training and Manpower Planning (ACSWTMP) held on 12.4.97 to form a working group with Ms Kay KU of the Hong Kong Council of Social Service (HKCSS) as convenor and representatives from the Hong Kong Social Workers' Association (HKSWA), Training Institutions (TIs), and Social Welfare Department (SWD) as members to collect and compile data on fieldwork instruction in local social work training programmes at both degree and diploma level and then propose a "standard" ratio/requirement. The Working Group on Social Work Fieldwork Placement (the Working Group) with members listed at Appendix I was thus formed. Taking into account the views of ACSWTMP members and hoping to contribute more on the issue, the Working Group agreed on the terms of reference at Appendix II. The Working Group had three meetings for discussion on related issued based on the terms of reference. The ACSWTMP endorsed this Report on 6.11.1998 and decided that this Report be distributed to TIs and other organisations concerned.
INFORMATION ON FIELDWORK INSTRUCTION
"STANDARD" FIELDWORK INSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS
Type of Fieldwork Placement |
Minimum Direct Student Contact Hours Per Student Per Week |
Concurrent |
|
2 days per week |
1.5 |
3 days per week |
1.5 – 2.0 |
Block |
|
4 or 5 days per week |
2.0 – 2.5 |
Course |
Minimum
Qualification and Experience |
Degree |
a social work degree plus |
3 years experience |
|
be registered social workers or equivalent |
|
(an advanced social work degree preferred) |
|
Diploma |
asocial work degree plus |
3 years experience |
|
be registered social workers or equivalent |
To ensure that the fieldwork instructors have sufficient time and commitment to offer adequate supervision to students and maintain reasonable communication with TIs and placement units, the mode of employment should aim at at least half-time basis, i.e. lessening the sessional mode as much as possible. In the long-run, number of full-time staff performing fieldwork instruction duties should be increased and preferably most lecturers should be encouraged to take up some activities on fieldwork instruction. |
In addition to regular direct contacts with placements students, fieldwork instructors’ placement-related duties should include reading students’ written work, listening to or watching tapes of students’ intervention sessions, selecting reference material, selecting reading assignments for students, keeping up-to-date reference material, attending meetings/staff meetings, writing reports, liaising with agencies, organising briefing sessions and orientation visits for students, participating in working groups on specific task related to the developing in fieldwork instruction such as revision of guidelines and relevant administrative work. All these functions are essential for quality fieldwork instruction, therefore, the performance of such functions should be counted as regular job duties in the calculation of employment hours. Besides, some TIs may require their fieldwork instructors to carry out other non-placement-related duties which include research studies, supervising MSW students’ projects/dissertations, course/tutorial/skill laboratory teaching, administrative work, personal tutorial sessions with students, student guidance etc. In view of the heavy workload of fieldwork instructors, ample resources have to be deployed to facilitate the instructors in performing their duties. |
OTHER MEASURES TO IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS OF FIELDWORK INSTRUCTION
4. The Working Group has also recommended the strengthening of the following quality assurance measures to improve effectiveness of fieldwork instruction:
5. As fieldwork instruction is a manpower intensive education process, authorities concerned should fully consider such process in allocation of funding to social work education.
6. Agencies providing fieldwork placement should receive proper recognition and resources in order to carry out the work.
7. A summary of TIs' views on the above recommendations (i.e. paragraphs. 3-6) is attached at Appendix III for easy reference.